Critical review – “Can Robotic Interaction Improve Joint Attention Skills”.
Description
No need abstracts
You should consider the following when writing the review: 1. Is the study properly motivated? Why is the research interesting and important? You want to briefly describe the other relevant literature and how this paper ‘fills the gap’ in the literature. This will require you to do some additional reading beyond the source paper. 2. Is the methodology sound? What paradigm did the authors use? Do you think this is a reasonable way to test the hypothesis? 3. Define the research question(s) the authors specifically address. 4. What are the results and what do they tell us? 5. How do the authors rule out other interpretations of the data? 6. What do the authors conclude from their research? Here is a chance for you to be analytical and creative – do you agree with the authors? Are there any other implications for the results? Do you agree with their interpretation? 7. You may want to end your review with a suggestion for a related future area of research or a potential follow up study. Are there any ‘open questions’ left by this study? How might you go about testing this?
Critical review – “Can Robotic Interaction Improve Joint Attention Skills”